What Foods Can Monkeys Not Eat, How To Tie Dye Leaving White Letters, Does Grandelash Have Prostaglandin, Articles L

With AF tracking, once you choose the subject and press the shutter release part way down, as the subject moves, the autofocus will follow it. I cant tell you how relieved I was about this I know that probably sounds daft, but my Leica rangefinders are default cameras that I rely on when I want to shoot without any thought to the camera. Changing from color to black and white takes a lot of menu meandering and I wish there was a way to place this setting into a favorites menu as in the M10 (I think). You mirror my sentiments about the camera to a t! Fast continuous shooting is useful for catching action shots. You can click any image for a larger view which is the best way to view it as this site compresses these down to what you see below . It was at this early stage that I noticed the first thing that has continued to make me scratch my head throughout the time I used the camera. Im really enjoying this site since discovering it! Usability is great (with some of the limitations you mentioned), and image quality of the 262 is certainly superb, and the main reason (aside from usability and a good sensor), at least for me, the Leica M glass, is a topic somebody else can cover much better than I can. Although it may be possible to choose among other frame rates, those recordings usually have lower resolutions. In fact, I caught myself using it a number of times without thinking. Waiting for the fishy in the little dishy by Gil Aegerter, Lava Lizard on Marine Iguana by ZimmWisdom. what a great text, and great pictures, thank you! Nice review.I bought a m262 this year when one of my pensions surprisingly came out.I wanted1] a digital leica m2] no video3] no live view4] no EVFBut i like to sometimes review a pic when i am out and about.The 262 is perfect for me and i love it.with the m-e 240 being announced i have noticed that used 262 cameras have already dropped in price so its possible i can buy a dream 2nd body.Meaning another 262. The M240 is wide and bulky. Live-view with any lens I liked was fun. You'd be wise to buy the best/latest digital body you can afford and leave a healthy budget for the best/most lenses possible. Functionalism be damned. For example, I have seen an as new M240 from a Leica Store for 2,495 and a Voigtlander Ultron 50mm for c.700. I've always wanted a Leica and was thinking of picking up a used M262 or M240 to replace my Fuji. 20% better video recording quality (main camera), Has continuous autofocus when recording movies, has continuous autofocus when recording movies. Now, that update costs thousands of dollars. I typically use a 75mm lens on my M 262. Posted December 28, 2020 (edited) A m262 is limited to the lens choice as it rangefinder view only. With the M262 even going away for a long weekend I would debate the need to even take the charger for a single battery. I am looking to get into the Leica M systemhave been on various of the Leica Fora, discussing the merits of an M9 / M9P. Then along comes the M262, digital Leica I'd been waiting for. Pasted as rich text. In this buying guide weve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best. To set it, you simply half press the shutter then jog the thumb dial. Cant quite stretch to the Summicron or Summilux at the moment All the best and, no doubt, I will be on here again soon with myriad questions! Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? I have an M246 where just holding down the ISO button, turning the thumbwheel to change it then releasing does the job. A series of photographs taken from the same position over a long period is joined together to create a short video. Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience-, Leica M8 A Year with an Ageing Digital Rangefinder By Rui Hu, Panasonic GM1 Review: A Digital ILC Alternative to the Olympus XA2? This was a heretical change from earlier Leicas. All content, design, and layout are Copyright 19982023 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved. Im not loaded, but I do focus almost all my disposable income on this. And the EVF is a very helpful feature sometime. Last thursday I thought for a few moments about selling my complete gear because of the new Q2, but then I thought about my beloved Summicron 90 from 1973 and my Tele Elmar 135 from 1963 and my Summilux 50 from 2017 and then I said to me: No!, I cannot sell them, I am not a fan of 28 mm.The only tiny shortcoming is for me the limitation of the maximum shutter speed (60 sec) and sometimes I miss an autofocus. After a few weeks of using the new Leica M262 I posted a review along with a few videos. Otherwise, the two cameras are similar since the 262 is really just a pared-down version of the 240 and if its mainly the rangefinder experience that you are after then you cant go wrong with either. I just recently bought a Leica M262, interestingly I read your blog and it actually helped encourage me to buy it. But even this hasnt really bothered me too much it might be a little clumsy what with the need to press 3 buttons when you want to change ISO, but the way the auto ISO works pretty much makes up for it. It is the first position on the menu, and setting WB on a grey card or to a preset is a matter of 3 or 4 clicks.Colors. I too prefer the more stripped back feature set of the M9, M240, and M10. These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both the speed and focus to capture fast action and offer professional-level image quality. With the M9, just going out for a day I would take two batteries. . We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder. Leica claims it uses different technology, whatever that means. All of a sudden, the M10 held a lot of appeal. Thank you for pointing me to that review. It is certainly one of the most economical full frame digital Leica M cameras out there, however, still a very expensive camera, even used. First you have to press the ISO button, then use the thumb dial to scroll to the ISO you want, then finally either press SET or the INFO button to lock it in. So, yeah, as I said, video is just not something I want to do with a Leica M camera! The resolution is given as a compound value, comprised of horizontal and vertical pixels. Theres a certain robustness or heft to the M240/M262 files that I personally dont see in the M10 files, and that is likely a result of the different sensors used in the cameras. So I still have ways to go to become a true minimalist! It usesa 24-megapixel CMOS sensor, a Maestro image processor witha near-silent shutter, and a quiet shutter-cocking motor. It has a better screen, live-view, no video and even has a ISO dial (like you might find on a Fuji). I upgraded from the M9 on single basis that I wanted a camera with a better screen. If you intend to use lenses wider than 28mm or longer than 135mm Liveview and EVF are very useful, also macro photography is much easier (essential with the new 90mm macro lens and macro adapter) or if you need video. The Leica M-D Typ 262 was released in 2016 and is already rather difficult to find. I am sure you have seen the funny Video of Kai Wong:https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Wong+Laica+M+262, I have indeed, thanks, I shall take another look its been a while!Sounds like youve made a good choice!I have recently picked up a TL to use along side the forthcoming M10 they both use the same Visoflex, Im going to take the charitable route here but Pera Detlics comment may be interpreted as Leicas are expensive and Pera doesnt have the matching skill set to justify buying one.I also feel that way. A personal taste thing of course, but youd think that a Leica camera would have a screen that was at least mostly accurate to the end photo? I have a X113 and an M262. Leaving aside the video recording, the main difference is the simplified menu of the 262 v the live view of the 240. You cannot paste images directly. ins.style.display='block';ins.style.minWidth=container.attributes.ezaw.value+'px';ins.style.width='100%';ins.style.height=container.attributes.ezah.value+'px';container.appendChild(ins);(adsbygoogle=window.adsbygoogle||[]).push({});window.ezoSTPixelAdd(slotId,'stat_source_id',44);window.ezoSTPixelAdd(slotId,'adsensetype',1);var lo=new MutationObserver(window.ezaslEvent);lo.observe(document.getElementById(slotId+'-asloaded'),{attributes:true}); The fact is, I really like them as cameras, but largely speaking they just function for me. The M240 is a camera where perhaps 50% of the image is created in camera, 50% in computer. Having live-view is great and the screen is an improvement but its too big for an M and the files look/feel like something that came out of a Sony. After more than a month of use it is apparent the M 262 Image quality is better than that of the M-240 (which i have used since it became available). The last four images you posted are the best images Ive seen from an M240. The transport lever on the Leica M3. No one ever uses video functionality of the240 anyways. If you dont plan to use ur leica more than that range of focal lengths then M262 is right for you. Interesting article as I picked up a used m240 at Christmas at a good price. As cboy pointed out above, that may limit lens choice. I wanted an M262 for all the reasons above but found an M-P 240 for a really good price and just turned off all the video and live view. Unsurprisingly, the camera never really made a breakthrough in the video world so perhaps Leica decided it wasn't worth keeping it. But nope, they included a hardly useful flourish, that as you say, looks like it was thought up but a marketing department. Also for helping critical focus wide open at close distance. While I am relatively new to the Leica world, I have done the exact same thing as you: I am selling my M262 (although not for another digital M!). You cannot paste images directly. By The Leica M10-R rangefinder camera has a newly developed 40 megapixel sensor that represents a big increase from the 24 megapixels of the previous M10 model. Afternoon all and best wishes for a happy 2021! I know youre right, I often talk about the bullshit involved in the upgrade path but it has an iso dial! If you intend to use lenses wider than 28mm or longer than 135mm Liveview and EVF are very useful, also macro photography is much easier (essential with the new 90mm macro lens and macro adapter) or if you need video. I dont mind adjusting contrast, thats just part of the process of me. The entire camera feels built to last and like a well engineered tool in use. They also give the image sensor a better probability in identifying the right area of the scene to focus on in more automatic modes. But the M9 for me has so many characteristics, beyond specs, iso performance or touchscreen blah blah blah. It happened with the M8,M9, more recently the M240 and now the M262. So the M262 is going to stay, and the Leica M240 go. The beauty of the Leica M262 is what they took away.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[336,280],'35mmc_com-box-4','ezslot_16',182,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-4-0'); That being said, even with major Leica models the upgrade path involves such small incremental changes. When moving from M9 to M262 Id not put too much thought into how much difference this would make to me, in practice though, this small change in interface makes a big difference to how the camera feels. This has all the advantages of shooting raw, while taking up much less storage space. The Leica M [typ 262], or M262 for short offers whats best described as a stripped-back user interface. I would say a hidden gem at 2/3 of the price for a used M-10. I cant even work out how to hold the Leica M240 for video, and whilst it has focus peaking, it certainly doesnt have the features the Atomos brings to the table. I think either will be a fine way into a Leica. That said, I do miss the live view feature. Since receiving a closer focusing lens though Ive noticed that actually the M10 rangefinder goes down to about 0.58m and the M262 goes to about 0.65m. Early M3 models featured a double-stroke lever, meaning it required two strokes to advance to the next frame of film and cock the shutter. Id mounted the lens to my M262 and was pondering how I was going to get used to shooting a 35mm lens again in such a short period []. Without a magnifier piece.comfortable view is 50-35mm. Though I prefer using Rolleiflex and an old M4 for my creative projects. But even then, its not close to other modern cameras. The M240 is a great camera that produces gorgeous images but you are undoubtedly going to love the M10. Image Quality. Cheers! In reality, Ive been saving for this m10 for a long time. I completely agree about the thumb rest, adds more (in a bad way) than removing the screen takes away, in my opinion. That said, Ive sometimes found that shooting in high contrast situations the exposure prefers to underexpose slightly, yet have always found the shadows to have plenty enough detail in them when pulled out in post. From what I gather, skin tones have better rendering with the M10. Great pictures and very interesting. I am seeing a few posts by M262 / M-D owners stating that there is slightly improved image quality and even less banding at higher ISOs on the M262 series cameras. Content contributor - become a part of the worlds biggest film and alternative photography community blog. Unfortunately, this isnt something thats fixed by the M10 either though I am definitely looking forward to how much the M10 improves manual ISO control for me. I know thats not a crime, I also know it has nothing to do with how much skill I have as a photographer. I realised Id only used it once in the last 6 months. Ive spent the last month or so shooting with a Leica M [typ 240]. Your previous content has been restored. Controls feel well balanced and satisfyingly precise. I prefer live view for wider lenses to an external viewfinder. document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value",(new Date()).getTime()); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. : very useful. Equally, Ive not found the dynamic range to be too limited. Its based on the body of the M240, but as Ive said, when it was released it was pitched as a more affordable stripped-back camera with less features. The type of viewfinder that the camera has. The number of megapixels determines the resolution of the images captured with the main camera. I can get focus on a defined distance or subject and with a remote release or the self timer, get stealthy images while at the same time getting real time information on exposure. Id probably buy a new car. I didnt really need the better low light performance that the M262 offered, and was quite happy with the speed and output from the often lauded CCD sensor in the M9. I do think the 262 files have an edge over the 240. With less than full coverage, you may have to crop your photos afterward to get them looking perfect. As the cameras are meant to have identical sensors, do we think this is just new owner's biased impressions (nothing wrong with that btw) is could there be something in this? RE: the ISO issue. Either way, its the M262 that I want to keepif(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1','ezslot_18',188,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1-0'); Though I must admit, this experience has had me thinking that an M10 would be better suited to me now. To seethedifference between Leica M Typ 262 vs M Typ 240 cameras we have put together Leica M Typ 262 vs M Typ 240 specs comparison tablebelow. To make pictures, those are good bodies to be used with good lens. Versus uses cookies to improve your experience on the site. In fact, apart from INFO button/screen which reports battery and SD card information, and the play and delete buttons, the ISO button and the menu it brings up is really the only part of the screen-based interface I use. Thorsten Overgaard recently posted two comparative X-Rite colorchecker images that show the colour differences between the 262 and 240 which sold me on the 262. I am including these 2 images taken from the same spot focusing on the same scene. That being said, this is pretty much everything I want from a digital camera or any sort of camera for that matter. Forget is a strong word. I guess its only really there as it was the most logical thing for Leica to put there in place of the LV live view button on the M240. Agreed that the 262 is like some forgotten model.Also agreed on the fact that once the camera is set-up, theres no need for the buttons and menus. The Leica M [typ 240] (or M240 for short) was the first Leica to adopt the odd naming convention that broke away from the M# convention of yore. All the added features that the M240 brought to the table didnt really appeal to me, and specifically because I didnt think I was interested in live view, I felt that all the M10 could offer me was an ISO dial. This might sound like a small criticism, and Im sure many wouldnt even notice or care, but actually it goes back to what I was saying earlier about familiarity. A higher screen resolution provides a sharper image, making it easier to review your photos. Keep up the good words! Theres been a couple of times when Ive picked the camera up one after using it in lower light and ended up shooting a whole loads of frames at a high ISO before twigging that the chosen shutter speed seems too high. I had recently bought a Nikon 50mm f/2 LTM lens and had mounted it on the M240. I currently shoot with a Fuji X-Pro2 and love it. if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1','ezslot_17',188,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1-0'); Overall, these changes made the move from the M9 to M262 feel greater than the sum of their parts. Ultimately I hope that the dial on the M10 will give me a greater sense of being in control and connected to the ISO settings Im using. Yura, I still use both with other M along. Leica has used the button space on the rear of the camera that is used for live view in the Typ 240 to add direct access to the white balance feature. The build quality of the M 262 is impeccable. Your link has been automatically embedded. Your previous content has been restored. Im not sure about the iso dial though, I feel like thats a feature that would really suit me. Which is the better buy? I'm not sure if it's ok to show a snapshot of the LFI article. Congratulations on your decision. It's slightly lighter than the 240 and I have no use for video nor live view in a Leica. The LEICA M typ 240 is the world's second full-frame mirrorless camera. From what I understand the M10 has substantially improved this feature and this is an attractive change. TheLeica M (Typ 262) has a pared-down feature set, an extra quiet shutter unit and a lower price than theM Typ 240. The Digital Leica M Samples Gallery (Any digital M from M8 to M-D 262) Below are all images taken with a digital Leica M from the 240 to the m_P to the M-D, the latest and greatest M Rangefinders from Leica Camera. Yes!! The latter requires the lens to have 6-bit coding or manual setting of the lens in the main menu. Damn digital cameras I can control film camera GAS quite well these days, but these digital buggers still get me! The Leica M262 feels to me like almost everything anyone could or should expect from a digital Leica rangefinder. A timelapse shows a long passage of time sped up. I keep looking at the 262 as a hidden gem. You can post now and register later. LV is handy for confirming RF calibration. The M9 was a simple digital rangefinder with limited features and menu options, the M262 has even less in the menu and a slightly improved user interface. Flip-out screens can be useful for tricky shots. Its a good thing to have for visually challenged oldsters like me. Limited to 75 - 35/28mm. Continue with Recommended Cookies. The sensor is not the same, by the way. With 100% coverage, you can compose the image correctly when you capture the photo. Great article as always! Resolution is an essential indicator of a screen's image quality, representing the maximum amount of pixels that can be shown on the screen. Menu. We have the top best product and truth reviews that will help make your decision easy. Epson RD1 style I loved my RD1! but it really did sound like something was missing inside compared to the 240. I should say though, this is probably because none of my other digital cameras work like this if this was my only digital camera, I would likely have gotten used to a lot quicker. I think the sensor is the same, only the signal processing is different because there is no LV. Nice write-up. Same lens, same settings - desaturated during RAW conversion. 3200-10,000 (I find this to be really handy for indoor family photos, which is essentially the only time I need high ISOs) the larger and brighter viewfinder the size (yes, one can really feel a difference) overall operational responsiveness to a much lesser degree: fewer buttons on the back of the camera, smaller red dot, more matte black finish. Of course with these features comes a fairly significant increase in menu options too, though I must admit, I was surprised how simple the menu remains given the extra features on offer.